Free 12 day fat blasting meal plan

Looking for an easy way to jump start your nutrition. We’ll here a no-brainer approach to optimal dieting.

Get yourself a free account at www.fitday.com to count your calories track your carb, protein and fat intake.

Download your free 12 day Fat Blasting Meal Plan.

Right click on this link  and save link Download

Enjoy!

Myths Under The Microscope Part 1: The Low Intensity Fat Burning Zone

Myths Under The Microscope Part 1: The Low Intensity Fat Burning Zone

By Alan Aragon  © 2006
The “Fat Burning Zone” On Trial

Origin of the myth

Dietary variables aside, the body’s proportional use of fat for fuel during exercise is dependent upon training intensity. The lower the intensity, the greater the proportion of stored fat is used for fuel. The higher the intensity, the greater proportional use of glycogen and/or the phosphagen system. But this is where the misunderstanding begins. Although I’m burning a greater proportion of stored fat typing this sentence, getting up and sprinting would have a greater impact on fat reduction despite its lesser proportional use of fat to power the increased intensity. Alas, sufficient investigation of the intensity threshold of maximal net fat oxidation has been done. In what’s perhaps the best designed trial of its kind, Achten & Jeukendrup found peak fat oxidation to occur during exercise at 63% VO2 max. This peak level got progressively less beyond that point, and was minimal at 82% VO2 max, near the lactate threshold of 87% [1].

Misunderstanding is perpetuated in fitness circles

It has been widely misconstrued that a greater net amount of fat is burned through lower to moderate intensity work, regardless of study duration and endpoints assessed. In addition the confusion of net fat oxidation with proportional fat oxidation, the postexercise period is critically overlooked. No distinction is ever made between during-exercise fat oxidation, recovery period fat oxidation, total fat oxidation by the end of a 24-hr period, and most importantly, a longer term of several weeks.. Thus, the superiority of lower intensity cardio continues to be touted over the more rigorous stuff that takes half the time to do. Fortunately, we have enough research data to gain a clear understanding. Let’s dig in.

Dissecting The Research

Mixed study protocols + mixed results = plenty of mixed-up trainees

As with all research involving applied physiology, the highly mixed set of results is due to a wide variation of study designs in terms subject profile, dietary manipulation, energetic balance, and actual intensities used. Nevertheless, the body of exercise-induced fat oxidation research can be easily deciphered by stratifying it into 3 subgroups: Acute effect (during exercise & immediately after), 24-hr effect, & chronic effect (results over several weeks).

Acute effects spawn ideas for further research

In addition to measuring fat oxidation during exercise, most acute effect trials look at fat oxidation at the 3 to 6 hr mark postexercise [2]. Fat oxidation during exercise tends to be higher in low-intensity treatments, but postexercise fat oxidation tends to be higher in high-intensity treatments. For example, Phelain’s team compared fat oxidation in at 3hrs postexercise of 75% VO2 max versus the same kcals burned at 50% [3]. Fat oxidation was insignificantly higher during exercise for the 50% group, but was significantly higher for the 75% group 3 hours postexercise. Lee’s team compared, in college males, the thermogenic and lipolytic effects of exercise pre-fueled with milk + glucose on high versus low-intensity training [4]. Predictably, pre-exercise intake of the milk/glucose solution increased excess postexercise oxygen consumption (EPOC, aka residual thermogenesis) significantly more than the fasted control group in both cases. The high-intensity treatment had more fat oxidation during the recovery period than the low intensity treatment. This implicates pre-fueled high-intensity training’s potential role in optimizing fat reduction while simultaneously setting the stage for quicker recovery.

24-hr effects come closer to reality

You can call it Murphy’s Law, but the promise of greater fat oxidation seen during and in the early postexercise periods of lower intensity cardio disappears when the effects are measured over 24 hours. Melanson’s research team was perhaps the first to break the redundancy of studies that only compared effects within a few hours postexercise [5]. In a design involving an even mix of lean, healthy men & women aged 20-45, identical caloric expenditures of 40% VO2 max was compared with 70% VO2 max. Result? No difference in net fat oxidation between the low & high-intensity groups at the 24 hr mark.

Saris & Schrauwen conducted a similar study on obese males using a high-intensity interval protocol versus a low-intensity linear one [6]. There was no difference in fat oxidation between high & low intensity treatments at 24 hrs. In addition, the high-intensity group actually maintained a lower respiratory quotient in postexercise. This means that their fat oxidation was higher than the low-intensity group the rest of the day following the training bout, thus the evening out the end results at 24 hrs.

Chronic effects come even closer

Long-term/Chronic effect studies are the true tests of whatever hints and clues we might get from acute studies. The results of trials carried out over several weeks have obvious validity advantages over shorter ones. They also afford the opportunity to measure changes in body composition, versus mere substrate use proximal to exercise. The common thread running through these trials is that when caloric expenditure during exercise is matched, negligible fat loss differences are seen. The fact relevant to bodybuilding is that high-intensity groups either gain or maintain LBM, whereas the low-intensity groups tend to lose lean mass, hence the high intensity groups experience less net losses in weight [7-9].

The body of research strongly favors high-intensity interval training (HIIT) for both fat loss and lean mass gain/maintenance, even across a broad range of study populations [9-12]. A memorable example of this is work by Tremblay’s team, observing the effect of 20 weeks of HIIT versus endurance training (ET) on young adults [9]. When energy expenditure between groups was corrected, HIIT group showed a whopping 9 times the fat loss as the ET group. In the HIIT group, biopsies showed an increase of glycolytic enzymes, as well as an increase of 3-hydroxyacyl coenzyme A dehydrogenase (HADH) activity, a marker of fat oxidation. Researchers concluded that the metabolic adaptations in muscle in response to HIIT favor the process of fat oxidation. The mechanisms for these results are still under investigation, but they’re centered around residual thermic and lipolytic effects mediated by enzymatic, morphologic, and beta-adrenergic adaptations in muscle. Linear/steady state comparisons of the 2 types tends to find no difference, except for better cardiovascular fitness gains in the high-intensity groups [13].

Summing Up the Research Findings

• In acute trials, fat oxidation during exercise tends to be higher in low-intensity treatments, but postexercise fat oxidation and/or energy expenditure tends to be higher in high-intensity treatments.

• Fed subjects consistently experience a greater thermic effect postexercise in both intensity ranges.

• In 24-hr trials, there is no difference in fat oxidation between the 2 types, pointing to a delayed rise in fat oxidation in the high-intensity groups which evens out the field.
• In long-term studies, both linear high-intensity and HIIT training is superior to lower intensities on the whole for maintaining and/or increasing cardiovascular fitness & lean mass, and are at least as effective, and according to some research, far better at reducing bodyfat.

References

1. Achten J, Jeukendrup AE. Relation between plasma lactate concentration and fat oxidation rates over a wide range of exercise intensities. Int J Sports Med. 2004 Jan;25(1):32-7.
2. Thompson DL, et al. Substrate use during and following moderate- and low-intensity exercise: implications for weight control. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1998 Jun;78(1):43-9.
3. Phelain JF, et al. Postexercise energy expenditure and substrate oxidation in young women resulting from exercise bouts of different intensity.J Am Coll Nutr. 1997 Apr;16(2):140-6.
4. Lee YS. Et al. The effects of various intensities and durations of exercise with and without glucose in milk ingestion on postexercise oxygen consumption. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 1999 Dec;39(4):341-7.
5. Melanson EL, et al. Effect of exercise intensity on 24-h energy expenditure and nutrient oxidation. J Appl Physiol. 2002 Mar;92(3):1045-52.
6. Saris WH, Schrauwen P. Substrate oxidation differences between high- and low-intensity exercise are compensated over 24 hours in obese men. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. June; 28 (6): 759-65.
7. Grediagin A, et al. Exercise intensity does not effect body composition change in untrained, moderately overfat women. J Am Diet Assoc. 1995 Jun;95(6):661-5.
8. Mougios V, et al. Does the intensity of an exercise programme modulate body composition changes? Int J Sports Med. 2006 Mar;27(3):178-81.
9. Okura T, et al. Effects of exercise intensity on physical fitness and risk factors for coronary heart disease. Obes Res. 2003 Sep;11(9):1131-9.
10. Tremblay, et al. Impact of exercise intensity on body fatness and skeletal muscle metabolism. Metabolism. 1994 Jul;43(7):814-8.
11. Yoshioka M, et al. Impact of high-intensity exercise on energy expenditure, lipid oxidation and body fatness. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2001 Mar;25(3):332-9.
12. Broeder CE, et al. The effects of either high-intensity resistance or endurance training on resting metabolic rate. Am J Clin Nutr. 1992 Apr;55(4):802-10.
13. Gutin B, et al. Effects of exercise intensity on cardiovascular fitness, total body composition, and visceral adiposity of obese adolescents. Am J Clin Nutr. 2002 May;75(5):818-26.

Myths Under The Microscope Part 3: Fat Burning Zone & Fasted Cardio Discussion & Afterthoughts

Myths Under The Microscope Part 3: Fat Burning Zone & Fasted Cardio Discussion & Afterthoughts

By Alan Aragon  ©

Not an “Either-Or” Issue
The current facts have been presented in parts 1 & 2, and the bases for conclusion should be self-evident. Let me clarify that HIIT and linear high-intensity cardio are not the best and only ways to go. Many folks have perfectly legitimate orthopedic, cardiac, and even psychological reasons to avoid them. Not only that, I sincerely believe that both low and high-intensity cardio have unique benefits unto themselves. Optimally, both types should be done, since each has specifically different effects. Saying that one is bottom-line superior to the other for improvement in body composition is as false as blanketly saying 5 reps per set is superior to 15. On the contrary, there is well-established benefit in periodizing training variables, or as they say in the trenches, “mixing it up”.

Too Much of the Same?

I’ve heard it mentioned that high-intensity cardio shouldn’t be done concurrently with high-intensity weight training due to excessive stress on the central nervous system. Perfect excuse. My primary response is, there’s no solid proof of that danger. Certainly there’s no evidence of it in my observations as a professional in the field, working with bodybuilders, and all types of other competitive athletes such as gymnasts, sprinters, boxers, etc (you know, athletes whose incredible physiques have nothing to do with weights + high intensity cardio). It’s true that some folks regard a precociously low carb intake as a legit reason to keep intensity low. However, if your nutritional program doesn’t adequately support productive training, then you’ve designed it ass-backwards, painting yourself into a corner of compromised adaptation.

The Options

Options can be broken down in the following ways: If you’re pressed for time, and you can do HIIT without any delayed onset muscle soreness overlap (by virtue of doing a low frequency of HIIT), and you can tolerate it joint-wise & heart-wise, and you hate spending time doing cardio to begin with, then do HIIT. On the other hand, if you have the time to allot for low-intensity steady state (LISS), and you do a particularly high volume & magnitude of resistance training which raises potential recovery conflicts posed by a high frequency of HIIT, then do LISS. If you’re somewhere in between the aforementioned 2 camps and you don’t have a specific preference or tolerance limit, do both types on either a cyclical, rotational, or even combined basis. Also, it can’t be overstated that unless you undergo a very gradual progression towards the musculoskeletal tolerance for something like sprinting, you can get hurt pretty bad & there goes your productive training for several weeks.

Fasted = Suboptimal

Fasted cardio is not optimal for reasons spanning beyond its questionable track record in research. There’s unavoidable positive metabolic synergy in fed (read: properly fueled) training, regardless of sport. This effect increases with intensity of training; even in untrained subjects, whatever fat oxidation is suppressed during training is compensated for in the recovery period by multiple mechanisms, many of which are not yet identified.

Athletes are known for their gravitation towards self-sacrifice, but some rely on hearsay, while others rely on science. Did you know that way back in the 60′s, it wasn’t uncommon for coaches to tell athletes in various sports to avoid drinking water before and during training? No comment needed. Good thing researchers questioned it, and enough data surfaced to validate claims of the skeptics. Sometimes counterproductive dogma indeed dies, thank goodness. However, the myths addressed here are admittedly more subtle than the water example. Even on suboptimal protocols, athletes all over the world still inch along, although not at optimal rates, and not necessarily to optimal levels.

So…

I see the bottom line like this.. Do the type you have a personal preference for, and also respect your physical limits. HIIT is quicker but riskier. LISS is safer but takes twice as long to accomplish the same thing. Again, do what you prefer & can tolerate, but do NOT make the mistake of assuming that LISS burns more fat. That’s misunderstanding the physiology of the matter.

I’ll end off by challenging you to diligently review the facts before blindly latching onto the myths.

Visit www.alanaragon.com for more research

Franco and Gerard after training for the movie 300

Franco and Gerard Butler after training for the movie 300. Very lean and ready to be the King of Sparta!

A very low bodyfat level as seen here is only achievable with dedication to training and diet.

How to count calories

If you insist on counting calories at least do it wisely. While I do not advocate “Rule-of-Thumb”
applications there is an interesting little exercise that can serve to guide you in your basic meal planning.
This one is provided by Nancy Clarke from her book; Sports Nutrition Guidebook (2003). This
particular text carries within its pages an incredible amount of information that would be of tremendous
value to any sports professional.

Most of my clients are afraid to eat real meals. They believe that eating, let’s say, a cheese sandwich
makes people fat. Eating diet foods, like rice cakes and carrots, feels safer. The problem is that
the self-created diets commonly allow too few calories and too limited a selection of (boring) foods.
The dieter ends up becoming too hungry. As a result he or she blows the diet and regains any lost
weight, plus more.

I calculate for my clients an appropriate calorie budget, so that they know how much is OK to
eat to maintain or lose weight. Just as you know how much money you can spend when you shop,
you might find it helpful to know how many calories you can spend when you eat. A calorie, or more
correctly, a kilocalorie, is a measure of energy. It is the amount of heat needed to raise one liter of
water by one degree Celsius. To get an accurate (ballpark) assessment of your caloric needs you can
apply the following formula;

• To estimate your resting metabolic rate—the amount of calories you need simply to breathe,
pump blood, and be alive—multiply your healthy weight by 10 calories per pound (or 22 calories
per kilogram). If you are significantly overweight, use an adjusted weight, a weight about halfway
between your desired weight and your current weight. That is, if you weigh 160 pounds but at
one time normally weighed 120 pounds, use 140 as your adjusted weight.
Example: Roberta weighed about 130 pounds but could healthfully weigh about 120 pounds.
Hence, she needed approximately 1,200 calories (120 x 10) simply to do nothing all day except
exist.

Table 5 — Resting Metabolic Rate
Here’s how a 150-pound man burns calories while resting in bed all day.

ORGAN                 CALORIES                    % OF RESTING MR
Brain                         365                                        21
Heart                         180                                        10
Kidney                       120                                         7
Liver                           560                                        32
Lungs                       160                                         9
Other Tissue           370                                         21

• Add more calories for daily activity apart from your purposeful exercise. If you are moderately
active throughout the day, add about 50 percent of your resting metabolic rate (RMR) If you are
sedentary, add 20 to 40 percent; if very active, add 64) to 80 percent of your RMR.
Example: Roberta was moderately active throughout the day with her two kids and her job. She
burned about 600 calories (50 percent x 1,200 calories) for activities of daily living. Her totals
were the following:
1,200 RMR + 600 cal daily activity
= 1,800 cal per day (without purposeful exercise)

• Add more calories for purposeful exercise. For example, when Roberta went to the health club,
she exercised aerobically for about 45 minutes and burned about 400 calories on the treadmill.
Hence, this was her total calorie need:
1,200 cal RMR + 600 cal daily activity + 400 cal purposeful exercise
= 2,200 total cal per day

• To lose weight, subtract 20 percent of your total calorie needs. Roberta deserved to eat about
2,200 calories per day to maintain her weight. Subtracting 20 percent of 2,200 calories (20 percent
x 2,200 = about 400 calories) left her with about 1,800 calories for her reducing diet.
In the past Roberta had tried to reduce on 1,000 to 1,200 calories per day. She was skeptical
about my proposed reducing plan of 1,800 calories. “If I can’t lose weight on 1,000 calories, why
would I lose weight on 1,800?” she questioned. I reminded her that when she cut back too much,
she’d get too hungry and blow her diet. She also lost muscle, slowed her metabolism, and consumed
too few of the nutrients she needed to protect her health and invest in top performance. I reminded
her that slow and steady weight loss stays off; quick weight loss rapidly reappears. A reasonable
weight-loss target is 0.5 to 1 pound (0.23 to 0.45 kilograms) a week for a person who weighs less than
150 pounds (68 kilograms); 1 to 2 pounds a week for heavier bodies.
The theory of “the less you eat, the more fat you will lose” contains little practical truth. Generally,
the less you eat, the more you blow your diet and overeat because of extreme hunger. For example,
if you knock off only 100 calories at the end of the day (the equivalent of two Oreos or a spoonful
of ice cream), you’ll theoretically lose 10 pounds (4.5 kilograms) of fat a year because 1 pound of
fat equals 3,500 calories. If you eat 500 fewer calories per day than you normally do, you should lose
1 pound per week. Now think of the number of times you’ve tried to knock off 1,000 calories per
day and have ended up gaining weight.
Remember, though, that weight loss is not always mathematical. Nature makes weight loss harder
for people who try to get below their set-point weight. If you have no excess fat to lose, nature will
cause your body to conserve energy. I’ve had thin clients who eat far less than they deserve yet maintain
weight.
Once you’ve established your total daily calories, divide them evenly throughout the day. Some
people like having six small meals: breakfast, snack, lunch, snack, dinner, snack. Others, like Roberta,
find that four meals per day work well for them.
I adhere to the philosophy that people should eat at least every four hours. That is, if you have
breakfast at 7:00, you’ll be hungry for lunch at 11:00. Yes, you could hold off until noon to eat, but
your body will be happier if you honor your hunger. Hunger, after all, is simply a request for fuel. By
eating lunch at 11:00, you’ll be hankering for a second lunch at 3:00. I call this afternoon meal a
second lunch, because if I were to call it a snack it would likely become cookies or chips. As a second
lunch, it becomes an apple with peanut butter, or soup and crackers, or cereal and a banana.
Roberta was initially skeptical of this four-meal plan; meals, after all, are “fattening.” She complained,
“I’m afraid I’ll get fat from eating so much at breakfast and two lunches.” I reminded her
that the purpose of the daytime meals is to ruin her appetite for dinner. By eating more during the
day, she would then be less hungry that evening, have more energy to exercise from 5:00 to 6:00
P.M., and be able to eat less (diet) at night.

If you hold the fear that meals are fattening, think again and remember these ideas:

• You won’t gain weight from eating a substantial breakfast or lunch. You’ll have more energy to
exercise and burn calories. Even if you were to eat too much at those meals, you could compensate
by eating less at night.

• If you skimp on daytime meals and develop a deep hunger, you’ll be likely to overeat at night
because of the strong physiological drive to eat.

• You’ll end up eating fewer calories, even though the breakfast and lunch and second lunch may
be larger than before. You’ll simply trade in the evening blown-diet calories for wholesome foods
earlier in the day.

• If you are not hungry at night, you can skimp at dinner and simply eat soup or salad. But don’t
have just soup or salad for lunch. It’s not enough.
Become familiar with the calorie content of the foods you commonly eat and then spend your
calories wisely. That is, include at least three of the five food groups at each meal and two kinds of
foods per snack. Too many dieters repetitively eat a single food, such as cottage cheese, for a meal.
This practice limits their intake of the variety of vitamins, minerals, and other nutrients offered by a
range of foods. Calorie counting can be a helpful bridge to get you in touch with the ability of your
body to tell you how much is OK to eat so that you feel satisfied. You can (and should) quickly replace
calorie counting with listening to your body’s signals for hunger and satiety. Calorie counting
should not become an obsession.

Elite Personal Training in Montreal

Personal Training

Need a personal trainer in Montreal? Looking for training for your movie cast? Give Franco Licasto and the BodyGenesis crew a call. Experienced, certified personal training on an individual or “Boot Camp” basis.

Also available on a consulting basis.. Achieve your goals for the new year!

Watch the video to the right for a overview of what Franco can offer.

Exclusive elite personal training in Montreal. Diet, programs and consultation

Contact us at webmaster@thebodygenesis.com

Bench Press

Flat Bench Press

The flat bench press exercise is considered the “granddaddy” of all chest movements. In fact
“benching” is thought to be one of the mainstay movements in the entire weight-resistance training
exercise inventory. Many trainees consider that the bench press would be the exercise of choice if
only one movement was to be permitted. Many other members of the weight-training population
offer a completely opposite assessment of the worthiness of the bench press stating that the bench
press exercise is the least effective of the chest movements. It can be noted that most of the highlyrecognized
names of the weight training game developed huge chests with the bench press as one of
their most relied-upon movements.
The bench press is a “power
movement” and as such it has earned
great popularity over the years with all
athletes involved in weight resistance
training. Power lifters and bodybuilders
alike have tested themselves on the
bench press movement from the inception
of weight -resistance training as a
measure of one’s strength and fitness
level.

The lure of bench pressing can be
found in both the proposed tangible
(growth and development) resultants as
well as the intangible (psychological
effects) of the ego- inflating sense of
supreme power associated with being
able to press a “substantial” amount of
weight. The competitive spirit of the
athletes is brought out with the performance
of the bench press exercise.
Even those athletes more concerned
with the developing of the shaping and
contouring of their musculature more
than in just developing their strength
are most frequently pre-occupied with
the amount of weight they can handle
in comparison to their colleagues in the bench press.

As is the case with most of the power-oriented movements, the bench press exercise can bring
out the best or (as it often happens), the worst in an athlete. The realization of being able to press
more weight than one’s colleagues can provide major inspiration in the attainment of new plateaus.
Unfortunately, it can also induce trainees into serious injury as a result or “overdoing it” in their bid
to add ill-advised poundages. Safe, efficient chest training can only be accomplished with a Strong
sense of reality and a conscientious approach to weight selection and to the correct exercise execution.

Movement Analysis
There is a high-risk of injury associated with the bench press movement. There is a prevalent
concern over the prospects of being “pinned” under the bar when attempts are made to implement
the advocated “progressive resistance” principle. The use of intelligent weight-selection would
represent the initial step in reducing the risk of injury. A spotter should be utilized whenever possible
to allow for the safe, efficient application of this highly-beneficial but potentially risky movement.
The use of intelligent weight
tion would represent the initial step
in providing for reduced potential
for external injury.

The risk of internal injury is
greater as there are several common
flaws in technique that can easily
occur creating a high degree of risk
for the athlete. Most of the internal
injury risk can be readily avoided
with the proper resistance selection
and correct movement methodology.

Common Causes of Injury

Increased Duress upon the Shoulder Joints
Whenever an athlete is injured during the application of the bench press exercise it is rarely the
chest muscle that is injured. Occasionally a trainee may pull or tear a pectoralis muscle but generally
the injury incurred is one that attacks the shoulder joint. When too much weight is used, the shoulder,
elbow and wrist joint must bear the brunt of the weight of the load. The neural-impulsing that is
supposed to be directed into the pectoralis muscles instead goes to the stabilizing area of the shoulders.
The muscles in the shoulders are often unable to handle the heavy loading that was applied with
the development of the chest in mind. The result is that the joint is forced to bear the burden of the
load which frequently duresses the area to a dangerous level. As well, the elbow joints can become
injured if too much weight is applied as they are often forced to become involved in support of the
shoulder joint.

Dl-advised Poundages Induce flaws In Technique
Using too much weight most assuredly will result in a number of serious flaws in technique
which will hamper growth and development potential and more importantly, expose the trainee to
high injury-risk. When the chest muscles are overpowered due to the use of too much weight, the
trainee is often encouraged to resort to a hip-thrust action at the initiation of the concentric contraction
phase of the lift. Frequently, the hip thrust is of such enormous force to force the trainee up
onto the toes which creates an exaggerated arching in the back.

Lower Back and Shoulder-joint Injury Risk
Exaggerated arching of the back creates a jamming of the facet-joints of the lower lumbar region
and can cause injury to the vertebrae and supporting discs in the area. As well, the arching action of
the back changes the angle of the movement application and the trainee can easily suffer shoulder
damage at the conclusion of the lift due to the strain that is applied to the joint when the barbell is
re-racked in the exaggerated posture.

Increased Eccentric Phase Speed-of-Contraction
As well, when too much weight is used there is a general tendency to allow the forces of gravity
to take over control of the movement in the concentric contraction phase. The forces of gravity
combined with the overloaded bar can easily overpower the muscle’s resistive power which results in
great stress being exerted upon the shoulder joints. Rapid speed-of contraction movement applications
during the eccentric phase can easily aggravate ligaments and tendons.

Dangerous “Bouncing” Resultant
When too much weight is used and increased rate of contraction results there is a tendency to allow
the resistance to come down out of control which encourage a dangerous “bouncing” action of
the bar as it comes down to the desired area of the chest. Depending upon the angle of the pressing
application (decline incline, supine, the trainee can be at high risk of both external and internal injury
risk.

Each Angle Carries Specific Risk
The supine bench press application could see the train~ bouncing the bar off the chest which
could result can result in a bruised sternum which in severe circumstances could invoke death. Allowing
the weight to come down too quickly during the decline bench press application could see the
bar coming down into the area of the throat as balancing is sometimes difficult in this movement and
the margin for error is small. No need to outline the negative ramifications associated with being
struck in the throat with a loaded barbell. Another danger of allowing the weight to come down too
quickly is that the bar will be lowered to the area of the ribs. If the bar bounces off the ribs, serious
injury is a virtual certainty. If the weight is permitted to travel through the eccentric contraction too
quickly on the incline bench press application the trainee is at risk: of being stuck in the chin or the
mouth with the bar. It is essential to lower the weight slowly and with strong muscular control.

Reduced Motor-unit Recruitment
In addition to the high risk of external and internal injury associated with bouncing, the considerations
for reduced growth and development potential should further detract the trainee from using
the bounce technique. If the weight is permitted to travel through the eccentric phase with increasing
speed the opportunity to apply strong muscular contraction in the eccentric phase sticking-point is
lost. As the weight is permitted to travel through the sticking-point by virtue of gravitational force
the muscle is not encouraged to contract against the resistance which robs the individual of an opportunity
to provide for a strength increase.

“More Bounce to the Ounce”
Another negative ramification associated with -bouncing is that it is difficult to monitor progress
when the bar is allowed to bounce off the chest. Bouncing also encourages an accompanying springing
action of the hips as they are thrust upward off the bench. This springing action is often so severe
that it induces the trainee to come up onto the toes which forces the back into an exaggerated
arc. The angle of application is now altered and it is difficult to assess how much work is being produced
by the fibers of the pectoralis major and how much impetus is being provided by the sur100
rounding muscle groups.

Effectiveness of Exercise Difficult to Measure
As well, there are a number of aspects to the lift that are difficult to measure with respect to applied
momentum when a bouncing action is used. For example:
- How far was the resistance permitted to travel with increasing speed in the eccentric phase in
preparation for the bouncing action into the subsequent concentric contraction?
- With how much force was the bar permitted to strike the chest?
- How far upward was the bar permitted to bounce before muscular force was applied to the lift?
- How much springing impetus was applied to the lift with respect to hip-thrust and springing-uponto-
the–toes actions?

Overload Principle Difficult To Apply
When a bouncing action of the bar and a springing hip-thrusting action are used it is extremely
difficult to apply the overload or progressive-resistance principle with any degree of efficiency or
safety. If the muscles are not encouraged to recruit additional fibers as a result of applied momentum
being permitted to be incorporated into the movement, then the ability to increase the resistance
rests with one’s ability to increase the magnitude of tile applied bouncing of the bar and thrusting of
the hips. Obviously such actions do little to increase the muscle’s affinity for motor-unit recruitment
and such flaws in technique can invoke serious injury.

To Lock-Out or not to Lock-Out
A major controversy surrounding the execution of the bench press movement is whether to utilize
a fully-extended arms position or not during the completion of the concentric contraction. Many
weight-training experts advocate the notion that extending the arms to the full lock -out position can
create strain upon the shoulder and elbow joints. What might be significant is that “blocking-out”
does not mean “snapping-out” and as such the fully-extended arms position can be considered a natural
one and that as long as the movement is performed with smoothly slow speed-of-contraction
movement applications there is no need to assume that the joints would be at risk.

Injury Risk Related to Partial Extension
As well, a less than fully-extended position of the arms encourages a rapid change in direction
between the concentric and eccentric contraction phases of the lift. Should the trainee begin to experience
fatigue during the application of the set, the weight can come down out of control as the required
amount of fibers have not been activated for the eccentric contraction phase of the movement.
By extending the arms fully, the trainee can pause at the top of the lift and make certain that
the weight is balanced before initiating neural-impulse firing into the desired region of the chest muscles
before commencing the eccentric contraction. Both internal and external injury can be significantly
reduced with the benefit of additional control as provided by the pause at the completion of
the fully-extended arms position.

Considerations for Hand Placements
There are several variations of hand placements that can be applied for the bench press movement.
The recommended hand placement is the natural grip displacement. The natural grip allows
for a right angle to be formed between the forearm and the upper arm which provides the safest and
most efficient placement for the development of the chest. Wide grips are utilized to expand the pectorals
but can create stress upon the shoulders. Other grips include the shoulder width and justoutside-
shoulder-width and just-inside-shoulder-width band placements. The shoulder-width and
just-inside-shoulder-width band placements hit the anterior deltoid heads more significantly and thus
are not as effective in providing for accentuation of the pectorals. Generally speaking, shoulder width
and inside would more highly-activate the triceps, while wider grips would highly accentuate the pectorals.
Note; the closed-grip bench press application is considered a triceps exercise and as such is
outlined in the section devoted to triceps training.

Considerations for Growth and Development Potential
The clavicular head of the pectoralis major is activated during the final portion of the lift when
the humerus of the shoulder joint is flexed. If the arms are not fully-extended the clavicular head is
not fully-activated which creates an imbalance in development between the clavicular and sternocostal
heads.

Considerations for Elbow Position
The elbows should be held away from the body in effort to place the accentuation of the pectoralis.
If the elbows are held in close to the body the pressing movement more strongly accentuates
the shoulders (anterior deltoid head), and the triceps. Also, the elbows should be positioned under
the bar as opposed to behind the bar in order to alleviate strain on the ligaments and tendons of the
shoulders.

Considerations for Foot Placement
The feet should be placed squarely upon the floor and maintain in the full-sole contact throughout
the entire movement application. If the heels of the feet are lifted from the floor it is a sign that a
lifting of the hips is being used to add momentum into the lift. If the bench is too high to allow for a
full-foot contact with the floor a raised platform should be used to provide support.

Normal Anatomical Position for the Body
Frequently, trainees are instructed to raise their feet up onto the bench in order to provide support
for the back. The concave region of the back that results from the contact of the back and the
gluteals with the bench is a natural one in that it represents the normal anatomical position. As such,
the lower back should not be seen as being in trouble if there is a space hollow between the bench
and the spinal area. If the feet are brought up onto the bench this hollow region is not removed the
knees would have to be brought up to the chest in order to flatten out the concave area.

Dangers Associated With Knees-to-chest Position
Bringing the knees up onto the chest can be dangerous. If the trainee suffers any loss in balance
(which can easily occur particularly when performing high-end sets or striving for new plateaus),
there would be no support available in order to stabilize the load. The trainee would be in danger of
slipping off the bench before the legs could be brought down to the floor in effort to gain required
support. Even if the trainee is able to avoid falling off the bench the imbalance of the bar would
create uneven pressure upon one side of the body. A resulting whipping action of the body could
easily occur, creating significant torque upon the body which would wreak havoc on the entire vertebral
column which could easily tear the ligaments and tendons in the shoulder. If a Smith Machine is
being used the knees can be brought up to the chest as the balance problems are removed with the
machine application.

Summary of Correct Exercise Execution
- Assume the correct preparatory position by lying on the bench with the feet placed flat on the
floor. Remember, if the bench is too high to allow for a flat-foot placement on the floor then use
a raised platform for support of the feet. Do not bring the feet up onto the bench.
- Grasp the barbell in a natural pronated-grip hand placement and remove it from the rack by
pressing the weight upward. Bring the barbell overhead so that it is aligned with the mid-point of
the chest and make certain the elbows are positioned out wide from the body not close in to the
sides of the body and that they are placed beneath the bar not behind it.
- Press the barbell upward to the fully-extended arms position and hold for a count before initiating
the eccentric contraction phase of the movement.
- Slowly lower the weight by directing strong neural-impulses into the muscle of the chest. Remember
to keep the elbows wide.
- Complete the eccentric contraction phase of the movement by lowering the weight to a point
that is just above the mid-line of the pectoralis major. Remember, no “bouncing”. The bar
should barely kiss your chest.
- Initiate the concentric contraction phase of the movement by extending the arms upward and
slightly backward in order to provide maximum accentuation of the pectoralis major. It takes
concentration to affect the backward motion of the bar. Note: Beginning trainees should learn
the correct movement methodology involved in the proper angle of application of the bar before
attempting to add weight. Those trainees suffering from shoulder problems may want to avoid
this approach. Others with sound shoulders will want to train light at the outset in order to learn
the proper technique involved and then add weight carefully. Many advanced trainees usually
push the bar slightly downward and outward and then upward and backward but this can create
potential injury problems for the beginning trainee so it advised against at this point.
- Complete the concentric contraction of the movement by raising the bar to the fully-extended
arms position. Remember to utilize slow speed-of-contraction movement application and avoid
snapping-out at the conclusion of the lift. You will also want to maintain contact with the bench
with the entire contact surface of the back and gluteals and maintain contact with the floor with
the heels in order to avoid incorporating momentum into the movement.

Keys to the Lift
- Concentrate fully in directing maximum neural-impulsing into the muscles of the chest in order
to alleviate the accentuation of the burden of the load to be taken up by the shoulders.
- Avoid “snapping-out” at the conclusion of the concentric contraction phase of the movement.
- Avoid the natural tendency to bounce the bar off the chest during the completion of the eccentric
contraction.
- Maintain contact with the bench with the entire contact area of the posterior region of the body
and maintain contact with the floor with the heels in order to avoid incorporating momentum into
the movement application.

Incline Bench Press
The incline (barbell) bench press is utilized
to develop the upper portion of the
chest. The fundamental principles associated
with the bench press movement as
outlined in the supine bench press exercise
remain. There are a couple of key considerations
to take into account with respect to
the specific application of the incline version
of the bench press movement.

Importance of Elbow Position
Magnified
There is a tendency to press outward
as opposed to directly upward against gravity
especially when fatigue begins to set in
during the set. It is imperative that the trainee
maintain the under-the-bar position in
effort to encourage the correct movement
application. Should the elbows be allowed
to move behind the bar, it would encourage
the forward direction of the movement
application. Because of the inclined angle,
the forward direction of the movement
application could cause great strain upon
the shoulder ligaments.

Differences in Grip and Lowering Position
Two more differences between the supine and incline movement
applications can be seen with the applied hand displacement and the
area of concentration of the finish position of the eccentric contraction.
The incline bench press should be applied with a slightly narrower hand
placement than that normally used in the conventional (supine) bench
press exercise. A shoulder-width or just-slightly-inside-shoulder-width
grip would be recommended. The resistance is lowered to the upper
portion of the chest at a spot just below the clavicle. If the trainee has
developed a tendency to bounce the bar off the chest the dangers of
such practice are greatly increased with the application of the incline
bench press application as the weight would be bounced off the clavicle
which could easily result in a fracture.

Tendency to Arch the Back
There is an even greater tendency to arch the back in effort to apply
a more advantageous angle of application during the performance
of the incline bench press exercise than in the supine version of the
movement. The trainee is induced into arching the back into a backward
“C” configuration in effort to apply a more powerful horizontal
body position. If you feel compelled to arch the back in order to complete
the lift this indicates that the weight is too heavy. Arching the
back destroys the premise of the incline application at and at worst can
cause serious damage to the vertebral column of the lower lumbar region.

Most Angles Too Severe
Another major consideration associated with the incline bench
press exercise is the determination of the optimal angle to be applied
for the most effective performance of the exercise. Most gyms have
fixed angles on their incline benches. I don’t know if the gym equipment
manufacturers ever trained at all or if they all got together and just
decided that somewhere between horizontal and vertical would be a
good place to start in establishing the correct angle to work with. Most
of the angles are structured at 60-70°. Such severe angles are not effective
as they accentuate the shoulders (anterior deltoids), and do not
provide emphasis upon the desired region of the upper chest.

25-30° Optimal
A more desirable range for the angle of the incline would be 25-
30°. If the incline benches are fixed at incorrect angles utilize a Smith
Machine or improvise by placing a platform under the regular bench. You will want to make sure that
the bench that you are using has a safe cradle for the weight and that a slight angle will not allow the
weight to slip out of the cradle.

Closer Grips for Inner Pectoral Region Development
In order to accentuate the inner region of the upper portion of the chest a narrow grip (8- 12
inches) Smith machine application has shown itself to be extremely effective. The Smith machine
allows for a consistent vertical movement application and encourages maximum fiber recruitment
due to the “same-line” exactness attributed to Smith machine training.

Summary of Correct Exercise Execution
The rudiments of correct exercise execution of the Incline Bench Press are repeated from the
conventional (Supine) Bench Press exercise, with the
exceptions outlined above.

Keys to the Lift
- You will need to press upward directly against gravity,
and not outward.
- Make certain to maintain the desired elbows-underthe-
bar position. You may want to utilize greater
wrist-extension to facilitate the maintenance of the
correct position.
- You will want to be careful to avoid arching the
back.

Decline Bench Press
Another variation of the bench press movement is
the decline bench press exercise. The decline variation is
designed to accentuate the lower area of the chest. Some
experts have deemed the decline press “a waste of time”.
Others have stated that the decline press builds the lower
region of the pectorals but that such development
only serves to provide for a less than desirable “sagging”
affect of the “pecs”. The suggestion put forth in this
report is that the decline bench press has proven to be a
very effective exercise in the mass mover category for
many weight training students and as such is a mainstay
power movement in this chest exercise portfolio.

There is no evidence to support the notion that the
decline bench press is a “waste of time” as overall development
of the chest muscles can be aided by the inclu-
sion of the decline angle application to the bench press exercise. As
well, the performance of the decline bench press exercise would not
encourage an imbalanced physique if the chest program included a variety
of movements nor should the trainee suffer from a “sagging”
problem if a well-balanced chest routine is utilized.

Decline Angle can Invoke Balance Problems
The decline angle of the exercise promotes a pressing outward lineof-
application during the concentric contraction phase of the movement.
As it is, the decline angle places extra pressure upon the deltoids;
if the bar is pressed outward the strain on the shoulders is magnified.
An effective manner in which to encourage the correct pathway of application
is to bend the wrist back slightly (wrist-joint extension). Bending
the wrist slightly will encourage the elbows to come forward under
the bar and not left behind the bar. With the elbows in the proper position,
the desired vertical line of application should be easier to affect.

Putting on the Brakes
As well, the decline angle also encourages a natural tendency to
press the bar backward behind the head at the conclusion of the lift. If
the line of the movement application is behind the head, the shoulders
can be strained upon the completion of the lift. It is imperative that the
trainee stop the movement before the bar is behind the head. Stopping
the backward movement of the weight is not easy once the contraction
is under way; strong concentration is required in order to “put on the
brakes” at the conclusion of the lift.

Dangers Associated with “Bouncing”
The bar should be lowered to the bottom of the pectoralis major
and should not be brought down to the ribs or the abdominals nor
should it be brought down to high near the area of the throat. Obviously
any bouncing action of the bar could invoke serious-even lifethreatening
injury. Even bouncing the bar off the lower chest can result
in drastic negative ramifications as the xiphoid process bone could easily
be broken with the result being that the fragmented bone could be
pushed into the spleen causing severe hemorrhaging in the area. Those
trainees who are in the habit of applying a “bouncing” action of the bar
would be well-advised to stay away from the decline bench until they
have cured themselves of the habit of “bouncing”.

Angle of Application Often Too Severe
As evidenced with the incline bench press movement there is a tendency among trainees to use
too great an angle for the movement application. While the decline press allows for a greater angle to
be applied than in the incline variation, a severe angle will make it difficult to apply the movement
with the correct line of application. If the angle is too severe the bar will be encouraged to be
brought down either too low on the chest or too high near the throat and facial area. In addition, a
severe angle will reduce the effectiveness of the exercise. A 30-35° angle would be as far as you
would want to stretch it on the decline application in order to provide for maximum stimulation of
the chest and to alleviate the risk of potential pressure being exerted on the shoulders.

Summary of Correct Exercise Execution
The rudiments of correct exercise execution of the Decline Bench Press are repeated from the
conventional (Supine) Bench Press exercise, with the exceptions outlined above.

Keys to the Lift
- You will want to make certain to lower the bar to the desired region of the lower chest, neither
too low to the rib cage nor too high to the throat.
- You will want to avoid the urge to bounce the bar off the lower chest or, even worse, the rib
cage during the completion of the eccentric contraction phase.
- You will need to concentrate fully on pressing the bar upward in the line of true-vertical, not
outward.

Machine Bench Press
There are several types of machines available for bench pressing and can be utilized to great advantage.
Machine “benching” provides a different accentuation upon the muscles due to the principles
of isokinetic contraction (please note that the machine diagrammed to the left is a variation of
a machine bench press that does not involve a CAM and as such offers an isotonic contraction). It is
recommended that the use of machines be interspersed with free-weight training as the exclusion of
free-weight training could reduce overall growth and development due to the loss of benefits of muscle
fiber hypertrophy attributed to isotonic contraction training.

Reduced Injury-Risk Attributed to Machine “Benching”
In addition to providing for a specific accentuation upon the muscle fibers which can produce
enhanced shaping and overall definition of the muscle, the machine application provides for the additional
benefit of reduced injury-risk. The risk of being struck or pinned beneath the bar is removed
as there is a safety handle that provides a margin of clearance for the body.

Machine Bench Press Applications

Vertical Bench Machine Press
The vertical or seated bench press machine provides
a mass mover exercise that is unique in that the
movement and the resistance do not travel in the
same line applied in a horizontal plane. The resistance
(plate-stack) travels in a vertical direction but the
movement is applied in a horizontal direction. The
effects upon the muscles of the chest are different
than in conventional bench pressing applications that
see the resistance and the movement going in the
same direction. As well, the risks associated with
pressing a weight upward over the body directly opposing
gravity are removed with the vertical press
machine.

Incline Bench Machine Press
The benefits of the incline bench press machine
include the lack of necessity of balancing a barbell
overhead where external injury risk is a factor. As
well, the fixed movement application associated with
machine bench pressing allows for maximum fiber
recruitment and a safe application of the movement.
The isokinetic contraction also provides for a variation
of muscle contraction to be applied in the incline
version of the pressing movement which can provide
additional growth and development benefits.

Decline Bench Machine Press
The already-mentioned benefits associated with
machine bench pressing applications are once again
evidenced with the decline bench machine. An additional attribute is the one that allows for the performance
of the movement to be applied in a sweeping angle of application that sees the resistance
first heading outward, then upward, and finally in a backward direction. Such application stimulates
the two heads of the pectoralis major and also incorporates the involvement of the pectoralis minor
thereby providing for enhanced growth and development potential.

Increased Safety Factor
There are a number of safety factors related to the machine bench press application that are even
more magnified during the performance of the decline press movement. The removal of the necessi-
ty of having to balance a barbell allows for the avoidance of the risk of smashing the barbell down
into the facial area or bouncing the barbell off the rib cage during the completion of the eccentric
contraction phase of the movement. The fixed angle of application also eliminates the risk of coming
too far back with the barbell during the completion of the concentric contraction phase of the lift.

It should be noted however that while machine pressing is considered safer than conventional
free-weight pressing, injuries can easily occur if proper form and correct exercise execution are not
applied. The trainee must utilize a sensible weight and concentrate fully throughout the entire movement
application in order to provide for a safe, efficient utilization of the highly-effective machinepress
movements.

Summary of Correct Exercise Execution
The rudiments of correct exercise execution of the Machine Press are repeated from the conventional
free weight (supine) Bench Press exercise, with the exceptions outlined above.

Keys to the Lift
- Utilize slow speed-of-contraction movement application.
- Maintain the wide-elbows position.
.. Accentuate the Pectoralis and reduce the emphasis exerted on the forearms.

Gluteals, Extensors and Rotators Intro

Gluteals, Extensors and Rotators

Often Overlooked
Very few weight-resistance trainees devote any direct attention to the muscles that comprise the
area of the gluteal region of the body. Even the most ardent trainees rarely design programs to directly
hit this prominent area. Instead, most trainees prefer to allow the “glutes” to receive inadvertent
attention via those exercises designed for the other areas of the legs. All squatting and pressing
movements activate the gluteal region
and as such, the general view of most
weight-resistance trainees is that these
movements provide sufficient attention
to the gluteal region. Additional
activation of the gluteal area is provided
during the performance of
hamstring exercises with the result
that most trainees assume that specific
attention to the gluteals is not necessary.

Such thinking represents a major
oversight. What is apparently not
realized by those expounding the exuded
philosophy above is that the
muscles that comprise the area of the
hip are extremely powerful and can
be utilized to great advantage in the
development of the legs. As well, for
athletes who are involved in other
sports involving the use of the legs
the development of the gluteal region
could prove to be extremely valuable
in reducing injuries to other parts of the body.

Strong gluteal development also serves to significantly improve performance in many other
sporting activities. The muscles that comprise the region of the hip are called upon during activities
involving running, skating, jumping, cycling, and are directly involved in all floor exercises involving
balance and thrusting actions such as evidence in aerobic, jazz, and ballet dancing. The gluteals are
also highly activated during the throwing events. Many retiring baseball pitchers have announced
their retirement to the loss of power and strength in the legs. A common feature of most power
pitchers is their strong leg development including powerful gluteals.

What should be realized by the weight-training community is that if the gluteals are activated
during other leg exercises then it only naturally follows that specific attention to the gluteals would
provide enhanced growth and development potential of the area which would provide the resultant
benefit of improving performance in other movements. For example, if the “glutes” are called upon
during the execution of the squat or leg press exercises then greater development of the glutes would
allow for increased performance on these exercises which would result in enhanced growth and development
of the legs.

Location and Function
It should be noted that the muscles that comprise the area of the hips work predominately as
hip-joint flexors and extensors they are involved in a number of other actions as well including ab-
duction and medial and external rotation of the thigh.
We shall examine the musculature of the gluteal region which includes not only the more commonly-
known gluteus maximus, medius, and minimus muscles but the piriformis, obturator internus,
and quadratus femoris muscles as well.

Gluteus Maximus (A)
Location
As the name would imply, the gluteus maximus contains the most fibers and represents the largest,
most powerful muscle of the entire body. This muscle forms a large pad over the ischial tuberosity
on the pelvis. It originates from the illium bone located on the hip and from the sacral bone on the
vertebral column, and inserts into the proximal region of the femur on the gluteal tuberosity.
It should be noted that most of the fibers of the gluteus maximus insert along the lateral (outside)
portion of the thigh and nm the entire length of the thigh from the hip-joint to the knee-joint.
This explains why the leg is kept in place and not forced outward during heavy exertion.

Function
The gluteus maximus serves as the major muscle involved in thigh extension at the hip and also
works as a back extensor during the action of hip-joint extension which helps alleviate strain on the
lower back. It also assists in the action of medial rotation of the thigh.

Gluteus Medius (B)
Location
Originates on the illium of the hip and inserts on the greater trochanter of the femur bone of the
thigh.

Function
The function of the gluteus medius is to serve in abduction of the thigh and medial rotation of
the thigh at the hip-joint.

Gluteus Minimus
Location
The most deeply-rooted of the gluteal muscles the gluteus minimus originates on the surface of
the illium and inserts on the greater trochanter of the femur bone of the thigh.

Function
This muscle functions similarly to the gluteus medius in that it is involved in the actions of abduction
and medial rotation of the thigh at the hip-joint.
We shall now examine the location and function of the three frequently overlooked, but highly
active muscles that complete the main muscle of the region of the hip.

Piriformis
Location
Another significant muscle of the region of the hips is the piriformis which sits atop, and serves
to protect the vital sciatic nerve. The sciatic nerve stretches from the dorsal surface of the pelvis, and
was it not for the piriformis, would be exposed to a wide variety of potentially crippling injury risks.
It should be noted however that a small portion of the sciatic nerve remains exposed. This is due to
the fact that the muscles of the region serve to function in the actions of flexion and extension of the
hip.

The above-point would be most noteworthy for those athletes who have chosen to take steroids.
If the steroids are taken by injection in the hip the athlete is in danger of penetrating the sciatic nerve
with the needle. If the sciatic nerve is penetrated, it then becomes deadened with the result being that
the athlete runs a high-risk of becoming paralyzed as ruination of the sciatic nerve destroys the ability
to contract the muscles of the legs.

Function
The piriformis muscle is involved in the actions of outward rotation of the thigh at the hip- joint
and abduction of the thigh during hip-joint flexion. The piriformis also serves to stabilize the hip by
maintaining the position of the head of the femur.

Obturator Internus
Location
Originates on the pelvic surface of the obturator foreman on the pelvis and inserts on the medial
surface of the greater trochanter on the head of the femur.

Function
The obturator internus is involved in the action of lateral rotation of the thigh in the extended
position, and medial rotation of the thigh in the flexed position. It also acts as a stabilizer for the hipjoint.

Quadratus Femoris
Location
This compact flat muscle rests beneath the obturator internus and takes its place of origin on the
ischial tuberosity and inserts into the femur.

Function
The quadratus femoris functions to laterally rotate the thigh.

Forum coming soon

We are currently installing the forums.. Coming soon!!

Intermediate and Advanced Training Programs

Intermediate and Advanced Training Programs

Those who wish to continue their weight-training interests following their curriculum requirement may want to devote more time to their training. With their more advanced standing and subsequent muscle growth and development may want to design programs that provide for added accentuation and exertion upon the muscles.

“Over-training” Syndrome”

The dilemma facing all weight-training enthusiasts is the one concerning workout duration. Many exuberant trainees set up routines that require up to three hours (sometimes more), to complete. Over-extending the time in the gym will not only prove to be non-productive to growth and development goals, but will, in fact, prove to be counter-productive. It is essential that the routines be set up so as to allow maximum training intensity without the risk of “burning out”. Over-training syndrome is the biggest cause of failure to succeed in the weight-training game. The biggest cause of over-training can be traced to inappropriate training regimes which simply are too long.

How Do I Avoid Over-Training?

The question that looms is, how do I make certain to include enough movements, as well as a sufficient number of reps and sets of those movements in order to provide for optimum growth and development potential while keeping in mind the considerations of avoiding the over training syndrome? The answer can be found in a program schematic that incorporates additional training days into the regime. Instead of training 3 days a week the trainee can now embark on routines that involve four, five, and six days a week training regimes. More training days means that the body can be divided (split) into segments allowing for accentuation on specific regions of the body as opposed to the entire muscular system.

Split-Routines

By training more frequently, the muscular system can be broken down into different parts. The trainee assaults specific parts on pre-determined days in a regular schedule of routines that allows for equal training time to each body part. By splitting the body into parts (split-training or “splitting”), the trainee is able to provide for an intense training session on each part without having to spend up to three hours training.

Over-training Syndrome Still Prevalent

It is important that the trainee not run rampant with the new-found provision of emphasis that the split-routine offers. Many trainees structure programs that have five or six exercises listed for each body part that they plan to attack during the workout. In addition, a frequent error in program design is seen with routines that call for five or six sets for each exercise! It should be realized that over-training syndrome can surface with split-training as easily as it can with the full-body training approaches and as such, appropriate program design is essential in avoiding the over-training syndrome.

Optimum Training Duration

The maximum amount of time that should be devoted to the anaerobic weight-training), option of their routine should be no more than 1 to 1½ hours. Remember, the body must be fuelled in order to promote muscle hypertrophy, long training sessions deplete the body of essential nutrients. It is impossible to eat enough to sustain two and a half-three hour training sessions. An outline of the various “split-routines” will now be presented. It should be noted that there are several approaches to be taken with reference to training schematics presented below. Experiment with several and monitor the resultant training effects of each of them. In so doing, you will be able to determine the most effective training schematics for your individual requirements. You will want to remember to design the program within a 1 to 1½ hour time period in order to reduce the risk of over-training.

Exercise Selection
When selecting the exercises to include in a training program, thought should be given to the following variables:
- Movement Classification — mass-mover, isolator, peaker;
- Training Mode — free-weight, cable/plate-stack, variable-resistance;
- Type of Contraction — isotonic (free weight), isokinetic (machine) – Type of Grip — pronated, semi-pronated, supinated; – Angle-of-application — supine, incline, decline, vertical, bent-over. When reading the specific examples provided in the upcoming sections, pay special attention to the above-mentioned variables, how they are combined and how they are varied in a routine and across all routines

4-days-a-week Training Upper/Lower
The upper/lower split, as the name implies, divides the body into the upper region—including the chest, upper back, shoulders, triceps, biceps and forearms—and the lower region—quadriceps, hamstrings, calves, lower back and abdominals. Then each region is trained on alternate days.

Upper/Lower Split Emphasizes the Development of the Legs
Unlike the remainder of the programs presented in upcoming section, the upper/lower split allocates a full day of to lower body training. This allow for more lower body exercise to be completed within the 1 to 1½ workout because training time is not shared with any other muscle. This allows for the trainee to potentially see significant gains in the muscular of the lower body. Unfortunately however, during the upper body workout, the five major upper body muscle groups must be squeezed into the desired training time. As a result, the upper body may only experience maintenance without any explicit gains. This kind of split is ideal for athletes nearing the commencement of the competition season who are involved in sports which place significant emphasis on the use of the lower body and at the same time require less use of the upper body. Examples of such sports include soccer, cycling, running etc.
Upper/Lower Weekly Schematic
- Day 1 Upper – Day 2 Lower – Day 3 Rest – Day 4 Upper – Day 5 Lower – Day 6 Rest – Day 7 Rest
Upper Muscle Groups
- Chest – Back – Shoulders – Triceps – Biceps – Forearms
Pull Muscle Groups

- Quadriceps – Hamstrings – Calves – Lower Back – Abdominals
Specific Example
- Day 1 Chest, Back, Shoulders, Triceps, Biceps, Forearms
- Day 2 Quadriceps, Hamstrings, Calves, Lower Back, Abdominals
- Day 3 Rest
- Day 4 Repeat Day 1
- Day 5 Repeat Day 2
- Day 6 Rest
- Day 7

Rest In the exercise listing below, the trainee is not limited to following the same routine for each body part in a training session. For example, a workout does not have to consist of Routine A for Chest, Shoulders and Triceps; it may consist of Routine A for Chest, Routine C for Shoulders and Routine B for Triceps or any combination thereof. This allows for maximum variety in the training program. However, it is not good practice to change the training order of the muscle groups in a push/pull program; therefore, in this routine, always train Chest first, Shoulders second and Triceps third. The following rep ranges are assumed based on the exercise classification – Mass-mover exercises: 3 sets of 12, 10, 8 repetitions – Isolation exercises: 3 sets of 10 repetitions – Peaking exercises: 3 sets of
10 -12 repetitions.

Push/Pull
The push/pull training split sees the body being divided into those movements which require pushing actions and those movements which require pulling actions. Pushing actions involve the muscles of the chest, triceps, and shoulders, while the pulling movements involve the wide range of muscles of the back and the biceps. Please note that because the push day is longer and more strenuous than the pull day, the legs will be trained on the pull day. There are obviously too many movements to name; please refer to the outline of program schematic (exercise routines) as a guide to designing your specific push/pull routine.

Push/Pull Programs Increase Over-training Risks for the Triceps
The considerations for over-training the triceps are emphasized if the trainee is following a push/pull program schematic as the push/pull program would not only see the trainee working the triceps during the actual triceps routine but also during the chest and shoulder routines. The individual would be at even greater risk of “burning” the triceps due to the accentuation of the “push-day” body parts. Instead of one or two movements of three to four sets on the triceps, chest, and shoulders the “push-day” body parts exercise schematic would be escalated to four or five movements performed for three or four sets each. Remember, the escalation of the movements is not just applied specifically to the triceps movements but also to the pressing movements for both the chest and the shoulders. A good approach to take with reference to program design is to utilize many of the shaping movements for the shoulders and chest in order to lower the number of pressing exercises which would significantly reduce the wear and tear on the triceps.

Push/Pull Weekly Schematic
The push/pull routine calls for a cycle of one push day and one pull day followed by a rest day and then a repeat of one push day and one pull day followed by two rest days. The cycle would appear:
- Day 1 Push
- Day 2 Pull
- Day 3 Rest
- Day 4 Push
- Day 5 Pull
- Day 6 Rest
- Day 7 Rest

Push Muscle Groups
- Chest – Shoulders – Triceps
Pull Muscle Groups
- Back – Biceps – * Legs – * Forearms * The Legs and the Forearms would be included in the Pull Muscle Groups as well although they do not entirely fit the classification. This is done in order to ensure every muscle is trained within the 5 day-a-week schematic and that the length of the Push and Pull routines are approximately equal.
Specific Example
- Day 1 Chest, Shoulders, Triceps
- Day 2 Back, Biceps, Forearms, Legs
- Day 3 Rest
- Day 4 Repeat Day 1
- Day 5 Repeat Day 2
- Day 6 Rest
- Day 7 Rest

In the exercise listing below, the trainee is not limited to following the same routine for each body part in a training session. For example, a workout does not have to consist of Routine A for Chest, Shoulders and Triceps; it may consist of Routine A for Chest, Routine C for Shoulders and Routine B for Triceps or any combination thereof. This allows for maximum variety in the training program. However, it is not good practice to change the training order of the muscle groups in a push/pull program; therefore, in this routine, always train Chest first, Shoulders second and Triceps third. The following rep ranges are assumed based on the exercise classification – Mass-mover exercises: 3 sets of 12, 10, 8 repetitions – Isolation exercises: 3 sets of 10 repetitions – Peaking exercises: 3 sets of 10-12 repetitions
5-days-a-week Training In the 5-days-a-week schematic the split is constructed to allow for two body parts to be worked twice within the week and one body part will be trained once within the week. The routine that is generally-applied is an off shoot of the push/pull routine. The split might be structured to appear as:

Week 1 - Day 1 Chest, Shoulders, Triceps – Day 2 Back, Biceps, Forearms – Day 3 Legs, Traps – Day 4 Chest, Shoulders, Triceps – Day 5 Back, Biceps, Forearms – Day 6 Rest – Day 7 Rest
Week 2 - Day 1 Legs, Traps – Day 2 Chest, Shoulders, Triceps – Day 3 Back, Biceps, Forearms – Day 4 Legs, Traps – Day 5 Chest, Shoulders, Triceps – Day 6 Rest – Day 7 Rest
Week 3 - Day 1 Back, Biceps, Forearms – Day 2 Legs, Traps – Day 3 Chest, Shoulders, Triceps – Day 4 Back, Biceps, Forearms – Day 5 Legs, Traps – Day 6 Rest – Day 7 Rest

In the first week we see that Leg/Traps is performed once within the week. In the second week of the routine Back/Biceps/Forearms would be performed once within the week. In the third week of the routine Chest/Shoulders/Triceps would be performed once within the week. Then the cycle would begin again in Week 1.

8-day Cycle Training There are two basic approaches that can be taken with reference to the 8-day cycle training schematic. The first would be congruent with the push/pull concept and the second would be congruent with the agonist antagonist concept. A working model of each will be presented.

Agonist-Antagonist - Day 1 Chest/Back – Day 2 Legs, Shoulders, Traps – Day 3 Biceps/Triceps, Forearms – Day 4 Rest – Day 5 Repeat Day 1 – Day 6 Repeat Day 2 – Day 7 Repeat Day 3 – Day 8 Rest

Specific Example As mentioned above, the trainee is not limited to following the same routine for each body part in a training session. For example, a workout does not have to consist of Routine A for Chest and Back; it may consist of Routine A for Chest and Routine C for Back or any combination thereof. Again, this allows for maximum variety in the training program. In an agonist/antagonist schematic, unlike that of a push/pull, the training order of the muscle groups may be interchanged. For example, on Day 1, Chest may be trained first, while on Day 5, Back may be trained first. The following rep ranges are assumed based on the exercise classification – Mass-mover exercises: 4 sets of 12, 10, 8, 6 repetitions – Isolation exercises: 4 sets of 10 repetitions – Peaking exercises: 4 sets of 10-12 repetitions

Push-Pull
In this schematic Day 1 represents the Push day; Day 3 represents the Pull day; while Day 2 is an intermediate day used for lower body training and an opportunity to train the trapezius and forearms muscles that do not strictly fall under either category. – Day 1 Chest, Shoulders, Triceps – Day 2 Legs, Traps, Forearms – Day 3 Back, Biceps, Lower Back – Day 4 Rest – Day 5 Repeat Day 1 – Day 6 Repeat Day 2 – Day 7 Repeat Day 3 – Day 8 Rest

Specific Example

Next Page »